Loading…
Movement refractoriness: The influence of response structure and speed
In the first experiment, refractoriness of a primary arm swing was studied using two movement speeds and three secondary responses (reversal, contralateral and ipsilateral thumb-lift). Pre-movement inter-stimulus intervals were 100, 200 or 300 msec and response-stimulus intervals ranged from zero to...
Saved in:
Published in: | Human movement science 1985-01, Vol.4 (3), p.203-228 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In the first experiment, refractoriness of a primary arm swing was studied using two movement speeds and three secondary responses (reversal, contralateral and ipsilateral thumb-lift). Pre-movement inter-stimulus intervals were 100, 200 or 300 msec and response-stimulus intervals ranged from zero to 200 msec. Accelerometers provided kinematic data. The second experiment repeated the reversal condition with the addition of EMG analysis.
The prediction that the maximal speed condition would show a general intensification of control processes, and thus less refractoriness as compared to submaximal speed, was upheld for all response conditions. The findings also supported the prediction that the pattern of refractoriness depends on the functional relationships of the muscles concerned.
The EMG analysis revealed that while the sequencing of muscle action was unchanged with movement speed, its phasing characterized the shifts in response metrics. The overall findings emphasize the need to view the refractoriness phenomenon in the context of anatomical and mechanical consequences of force changes in controlling limb movement as they interact with intentional command. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-9457 1872-7646 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0167-9457(85)90003-X |