Loading…
A comparison of the drift potential of a novel twin fluid nozzle with conventional low volume flat fan nozzles when using a range of adjuvants
Spray drift from a novel twin fluid nozzle and low volume hydraulic pressure flat-fan nozzles has been measured in a wind tunnel. At a wind speed of 4.2 m s −1, drift from the twin fluid nozzle, spraying a range of adjuvants increased with decreasing flow rate. Emulsifiable oil adjuvants produced le...
Saved in:
Published in: | Crop protection 1996-03, Vol.15 (2), p.147-152 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Spray drift from a novel twin fluid nozzle and low volume hydraulic pressure flat-fan nozzles has been measured in a wind tunnel. At a wind speed of 4.2 m s
−1, drift from the twin fluid nozzle, spraying a range of adjuvants increased with decreasing flow rate. Emulsifiable oil adjuvants produced less drift than an ethoxylated alcohol surfactant, in general agreement with data on in-flight droplet spectra. Comparing drift between the twin fluid nozzle and the flat fan nozzles at a constant flow rate of 600 ml min
−1 showed that drift from the former was intermediate between standard and low-drift nozzles. Drift increased with increasing spray release height, but for the twin fluid nozzle at 400 ml min
−1 at 50 cm was smaller than that from the same nozzle atomising 150 ml min
−1 at a height of 35 cm. Air inclusions in droplets from the twin fluid nozzles did not influence drift. The need for a technique to measure the mass of droplets containing air inclusions is highlighted and the method of plotting drift at variable wind speeds is discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0261-2194 1873-6904 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0261-2194(95)00089-5 |