Loading…

Variance of water advance in wide-spaced furrow irrigation

Characteristics of water flow in wide-spaced furrow irrigation (W), 2.84 m spacing, were compared to every furrow irrigation (E), 1.42 m spacing. The study was conducted at Goodwell, Oklahoma on a clay loam soil with grain sorghum. Water was applied at a constant 0.75 L s −1 rate to all furrows. Bec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agricultural water management 1989, Vol.16 (1), p.5-13
Main Authors: Hodges, Mark E., Stone, John F., Garton, James E., Weeks, David L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Characteristics of water flow in wide-spaced furrow irrigation (W), 2.84 m spacing, were compared to every furrow irrigation (E), 1.42 m spacing. The study was conducted at Goodwell, Oklahoma on a clay loam soil with grain sorghum. Water was applied at a constant 0.75 L s −1 rate to all furrows. Because W prevents meeting of wetting fronts from adjacent furrows, it was expected that water would advance more slowly in the W than in E due to the continual lateral wetting in W. Rate of advance of water down the furrow in the E treatment ranged from 1.23 to 1.48 times greater than in the W depending upon soil type and slope. Logarithm of distance of advance of furrow stream varied closely with logarithm of time for each furrow indicating that measurements made relatively early in the irrigation of a furrow could predict rate of advance while irrigating. Advance rates of the W treatment were no more variable than the E. W could be adjusted by trial and error to advance at the same rate as E by making needed adjustments to furrow inflow rate to W early in the irrigation. One would merely need to have several adjacent E furrows in the field close by for comparison.
ISSN:0378-3774
1873-2283
DOI:10.1016/0378-3774(89)90036-X