On progress in forces since the DLVO theory

The simplicity, consistency and an understanding of the limitation of the original DLVO theory has been lost. Where the theory apparently fails, new words to describe `non-DLVO' forces have been invented. `Extra-DLVO' forces, words like hydration, structural, oscillatory, hydrophobic, depl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advances in colloid and interface science 1999-12, Vol.83 (1), p.1-17
Main Author: Ninham, B.W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Colloid science
DLVO theory
Double layer
Forces
Lifschitz theory
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The simplicity, consistency and an understanding of the limitation of the original DLVO theory has been lost. Where the theory apparently fails, new words to describe `non-DLVO' forces have been invented. `Extra-DLVO' forces, words like hydration, structural, oscillatory, hydrophobic, depletion, fluctuation, protrusion forces infest the literature. Some are real enough but some have the status of phlogiston. All predictability has disappeared in a confused proliferation of parameters. The original theory does not account for specific ion effects embraced by the term Hofmeister series. Nor did it pretend to. There is a fundamental inconsistency even at the continuum level in treating double layers via a non linear theory, and van der Waals-Casimir-Lifschitz forces by a linear theory. Further no theories have considered the effects of dissolved gas which are extremely important. An account will be given of the present situation in colloidal interactions, and how to resolve it.
ISSN:0001-8686
1873-3727
DOI:10.1016/S0001-8686(99)00008-1