Loading…
The number of s-dimensional faces in a complex: An analogy between the simplex and the cube
Suppose a complex has a fixed number of r-dimensional faces. How many s-dimensional faces can it have? In particular, what is the maximum possible number if rs? For a subcomplex of a simplex, this has already been answered in Kruskal [3]. The work of Bernstein [1] and Harper [2] provides an answer f...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of combinatorial theory 1969, Vol.6 (1), p.86-89 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Suppose a complex has a fixed number of
r-dimensional faces. How many
s-dimensional faces can it have? In particular, what is the maximum possible number if
rs? For a subcomplex of a simplex, this has already been answered in Kruskal [3]. The work of Bernstein [1] and Harper [2] provides an answer for a subcomplex of the cube, if
r=0 and
s=1. The present paper points out a very strong analogy between the two situations, in which “Harper arrays” in a cube correspond to the “cascade complexes” in a simplex. By analogy, it is plausible to conjecture that simply counting the faces of a Harper array will provide the answer in the cube situation. I believe that this conjecture is almost surely correct. The pertinent formulas for the Harper array are presented. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-9800 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0021-9800(69)80109-2 |