Explaining the development of false memories

We review six explanatory dimensions of false memory in children that are relevant to forensic practice: measurement, development, social factors, individual differences, varieties of memories and memory judgments, and varieties of procedures that induce false memories. We conclude that, despite gre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Developmental review 2002, Vol.22 (3), p.436-489
Main Authors: Reyna, Valerie F, Holliday, Robyn, Marche, Tammy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Child Development
Children
Evidence (Legal)
False Memories
Forensic Psychology
Individual Development
Individual Differences
Interviews
Measurement Techniques
Memory
Performance Factors
Recall (Psychology)
Theories
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We review six explanatory dimensions of false memory in children that are relevant to forensic practice: measurement, development, social factors, individual differences, varieties of memories and memory judgments, and varieties of procedures that induce false memories. We conclude that, despite greater fidelity to real-world false memory contexts, recent studies fail to use known techniques that separate mere acquiescence from memory changes. Acquiescence and memory interact in interrogation through a dynamic process of construing both questions and memories. Fuzzy-trace theory’s verbatim–gist distinction offers an explanation for how this construal process can transform acquiescence into false memory. Acquiescence and false memory are further exacerbated by individual differences in cognition, personality, and social factors. To avoid such effects, interviewers should not encourage children to consider, imagine, or interpret alternative versions of events, especially with repeated specific questions rather than open-ended free recall. The goal of interviews should be not only to separate truth from falsity, but also to separate the fuzzy truth, the construal of questions and gist memories, from the verbatim “just-the-facts” truth required for the administration of justice.
ISSN:0273-2297
1090-2406
DOI:10.1016/S0273-2297(02)00003-5