Loading…

The metabolisable energy requirement for maintenance and the efficiency of use of metabolisable energy for lactation and tissue gain in dairy cows offered a straw/concentrate ration

Data from a series of 36 complete energy balance trials (determined by indirect calorimetry) with eight high genetic merit lactating Holstein Friesian cows offered a straw/concentrate ration (0.18:0.82 dry matter basis) were analysed by a range of regression techniques to determine the metabolisable...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Livestock production science 1999-08, Vol.61 (1), p.23-31
Main Authors: Kirkland, R.M, Gordon, F.J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Data from a series of 36 complete energy balance trials (determined by indirect calorimetry) with eight high genetic merit lactating Holstein Friesian cows offered a straw/concentrate ration (0.18:0.82 dry matter basis) were analysed by a range of regression techniques to determine the metabolisable energy (ME) required for maintenance (ME m), and the efficiencies of ME use for lactation ( k l) and concomitant tissue gain ( k g). In the data set, milk yield ranged from 1.0 to 37.2 kg/day (s.d. 10.56), with this achieved by stage of lactation, plane of nutrition and drying off two quarters of all animals. Mean ME m was determined as 0.61 MJ/kg 0.75 per day (range 0.60–0.62) which was proportionately 0.27 above the value predicted from Agricultural and Food Research Council ( AFRC, 1990) (0.48 MJ/kg 0.75). It is suggested that ME m is influenced by animal genotype or body condition, which can both reflect differences in fat and protein contents of the body. The mean k l value produced was 0.59, which is above that (0.51) calculated from the relationship k l= E l(0)/ME p when the latter is calculated using the ME m predicted from AFRC (1990). The mean derived value of k g, 0.86, has limited biological meaning considering the small portion of total energy use on which the estimate is based.
ISSN:0301-6226
1872-6070
DOI:10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00046-9