Relationships between specific leaf weight and mineral concentration among genotypes

• Published in: Field crops research 1997-08, Vol.54 (1), p.19-28
• Main Authors: Brown, R.Harold, Byrd, George T.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: ARACHIS HYPOGAEA; calcium; carbohydrates; cell wall components; CELL WALLS; Cenchrus americanus; CONTENIDO MINERAL; FEUILLE; genotype; growing media; HOJAS; hydroponics; LEAF AREA; LEAVES; magnesium; MINERAL CONTENT; PARED CELULAR; PAROI CELLULAIRE; Peanut; Pearl millet; PENNISETUM GLAUCUM; PESO; phosphorus; POIDS; potassium; Specific leaf weight (leaf weight/leaf area); SUPERFICIE FOLIAR; SURFACE FOLIAIRE; TENEUR EN ELEMENTS MINERAUX; USO DEL AGUA; UTILISATION DE L'EAU; WATER USE; Water-use efficiency; WEIGHT
• ISSN: 0378-4290; 1872-6852
• DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4290(96)03450-8

Physiological functions are usually expressed on a leaf area basis, whereas leaf mineral concentrations are often expressed on a dry matter basis. If specific leaf weight (SLW; g DM m −2 leaf) differs among genotypes then variability in mineral concentration may depend on the basis of expression. Data from experiments with peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) and pearl millet [ Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] lines and from the literature were used to examine relationships between leaf mineral concentration and SLW. Peanut and pearl millet were grown in pots in the greenhouse in soil and solution cultures. Specific leaf weight and ash and mineral concentrations were determined at the end of the experiments. Leaf ash concentration on a dry matter basis was negatively correlated with SLW and the correlation coefficients were significant in six of nine comparisons for the two species; r = −0.65 to −0.93. In the one peanut experiment in which mineral elements were determined, the correlations with ash were due mainly to correlations with Ca and Mg, while in pearl millet, correlations were due mainly to K. The slope of a plot of leaf constituents per unit of leaf area against SLW for a range of lines is a measure of the contribution of that leaf constituent to increased SLW. From data in the literature it appears that increased SLW is due mostly to the increase of cell wall components and nonstructural carbohydrates, and sometimes protein. Leaf mineral per unit of leaf area appears to be unrelated or only slightly increased with increased SLW and thus declines on a unit weight basis because of dilution by increased cell wall content or soluble carbohydrate.