Loading…

Hardness of Cu–Mn–Al alloys as a function of the annealing temperature in the β phase

Samples of Cu–10.0at.%Mn–18.8at.%Al and Cu–11.0at.%Mn–18.1at.%Al alloys were prepared in the metastable austenitic β phase, by quenching from 1123 K into water at room temperature. The as quenched samples were found to be L2 1 ordered. Aging of these alloys at different temperatures induced an evolu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Materials science & engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing, 1999-12, Vol.273, p.590-594
Main Authors: Prado, M.O, Tolley, A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Samples of Cu–10.0at.%Mn–18.8at.%Al and Cu–11.0at.%Mn–18.1at.%Al alloys were prepared in the metastable austenitic β phase, by quenching from 1123 K into water at room temperature. The as quenched samples were found to be L2 1 ordered. Aging of these alloys at different temperatures induced an evolution of the microhardness. These microhardness changes are interpreted using the information from X-ray diffraction (XRD), martensitic transformation temperature measurements, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and microanalysis using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Changes in microhardness at low temperatures are correlated with the martensitic transformation temperature M s provided that M s is close to room temperature. Microhardness changes at higher temperatures are caused by the decomposition of the β phase. The kinetics of β phase decomposition was followed measuring its 200 XRD peak intensity. The experiments suggest that the last vestiges of β phase are L2 1 long range ordered and that an α fcc phase is formed during the first stages of decomposition.
ISSN:0921-5093
1873-4936
DOI:10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00435-9