Loading…

The U.S. National Physical Activity Plan

Background The 2010 U.S. National Physical Activity Plan contains a comprehensive set of policies, programs, and initiatives to increase physical activity. Purpose To determine the early awareness, use, diffusion, and implementation of the plan among members of the National Society of Physical Activ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of preventive medicine 2013-05, Vol.44 (5), p.431-438
Main Authors: Evenson, Kelly R., PhD, MS, Brownson, Ross C., PhD, Satinsky, Sara B., MCRP, MPH, Eyler, Amy A., PhD, Kohl, Harold W., MPH, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background The 2010 U.S. National Physical Activity Plan contains a comprehensive set of policies, programs, and initiatives to increase physical activity. Purpose To determine the early awareness, use, diffusion, and implementation of the plan among members of the National Society of Physical Activity Practitioners in Public Health. Methods The web-based survey was conducted in 2011 and analyzed in 2011–2012. The survey was guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework and Diffusion of Innovations theory. Of 492 professional members, 291 responded. Results Overall, 79% reported awareness of the plan, with higher odds among state practitioners compared to other practitioners and among those with state partnerships to address physical activity compared to those without. Among those who were aware ( n =230), 15% reported using the plan ≥6 times, whereas 28% had never used it. For those who referred to the plan at least once in their work ( n =165), the most commonly reported uses were for brainstorming and discussion (73%); development and implementation of activities (55%); and state-level goal-setting (34%). Related to diffusion principles, many respondents reported that the plan fit their organization's goals (85%) and was easy to understand (81%), yet fewer agreed that changes made after the plan were easy to observe (32%); easy to implement (28%); and low-cost (25%). Conclusions This theory-based evaluation found that the National Physical Activity Plan has been broadly disseminated to physical activity practitioners working in public health. Opportunities exist for public health practitioners and others to more fully integrate the plan into their work.
ISSN:0749-3797
1873-2607
DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.02.002