Loading…

A Multi-Approach Evaluation System (MA-ES) of Organic Rankine Cycles (ORC) used in waste heat utilization

•The MA-ES provides comprehensive valuations on ORC used for waste heat utilization.•The MA-ES covers energetic, exergetic and economic evaluations of typical ORCs.•The MA-ES is a general assessing method without restriction to specific ORC condition.•Two ORC cases of ICE waste-heat-recovery are exe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied energy 2014-11, Vol.132, p.325-338
Main Authors: Shu, Gequn, Yu, Guopeng, Tian, Hua, Wei, Haiqiao, Liang, Xingyu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•The MA-ES provides comprehensive valuations on ORC used for waste heat utilization.•The MA-ES covers energetic, exergetic and economic evaluations of typical ORCs.•The MA-ES is a general assessing method without restriction to specific ORC condition.•Two ORC cases of ICE waste-heat-recovery are exemplified applying the MA-ES. A Multi-Approach Evaluation System (MA-ES) is established in this paper providing comprehensive evaluations on Organic Rankine Cycles (ORC) used for waste heat utilization. The MA-ES covers three main aspects of typical ORC performance: basic evaluations of energy distribution and system efficiency based on the 1st law of thermodynamics; evaluations of exergy distribution and exergy efficiency based on the 2nd law of thermodynamics; economic evaluations based on calculations of equipment capacity, investment and cost recovery. The MA-ES is reasonably organized aiming at providing a general method of ORC performance assessment, without restrictions to system configurations, operation modes, applications, working fluid types, equipment conditions, process parameters and so on. Two ORC cases of internal combustion engines’ (ICEs) waste-heat-recovery are exemplified to illustrate the applications of the evaluation system. The results clearly revealed the performance comparisons among ORC configurations and working fluids referred. The comparisons will provide credible guidance for ORC design, equipment selection and system construction.
ISSN:0306-2619
1872-9118
DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.007