On the utility death spiral and the impact of utility rate structures on the adoption of residential solar photovoltaics and energy storage

• Published in: Applied energy 2017-01, Vol.185, p.627-641
• Main Authors: Laws, Nicholas D., Epps, Brenden P., Peterson, Steven O., Laser, Mark S., Wanjiru, G. Kamau
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Distributed generation; Renewable energy; Residential energy storage; Residential solar PV; Utility death spiral
• ISSN: 0306-2619; 1872-9118
• DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.123

•A death spiral occurs only with both high PV adoption rates and high utility costs.•Community solar and rental property PV adoption increase risk of a death spiral.•The net metering pricing structure both rewards DG and reduces grid defection.•Our novel system dynamics model is available open-source for the research community. Today, many electric utilities are changing their pricing structures to address the rapidly-growing market for residential photovoltaic (PV) and electricity storage technologies. Little is known about how the new utility pricing structures will affect the adoption rates of these technologies, as well as the ability of utilities to prevent widespread grid defection. We present a system dynamics model that predicts the retail price of electricity and the adoption rates of residential solar photovoltaic and energy storage systems. Simulations are run from the present day to the year 2050 using three different utility business models: net metering, wholesale compensation, and demand charge. Validation results, initialized with historical data for three different cities, agree well with expert forecasts for the retail price of electricity. Sensitivity analyses are conducted to investigate the likelihood of a “utility death spiral”, which is a catastrophic loss of business due to widespread grid-defection. Results indicate that a utility death spiral requires a perfect storm of high intrinsic adoption rates, rising utility costs, and favorable customer financials. Interestingly, the model indicates that pricing structures that reduce distributed generation compensation support grid defection, whereas pricing structures that reward distributed generation (such as net metering) also reduce grid defection and the risk of a death spiral.