Loading…

Characteristics of co-combustion and kinetic study on hydrochar with oil shale: A thermogravimetric analysis

•Combustion behavior of oil shale and hydrochar was studied.•The complex interaction occurred during co-combustion of the blends.•Kinetics evaluations were calculated by using model-free method.•The lowest average activation energy was obtained by blending 70% oil shale. Thermogravimetric analysis w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied thermal engineering 2017-01, Vol.110, p.1420-1427
Main Authors: Yao, Zhongliang, Ma, Xiaoqian, Wang, Zihuan, Chen, Limei
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Combustion behavior of oil shale and hydrochar was studied.•The complex interaction occurred during co-combustion of the blends.•Kinetics evaluations were calculated by using model-free method.•The lowest average activation energy was obtained by blending 70% oil shale. Thermogravimetric analysis was conducted to evaluate the kinetic parameters for oil shale, hydrochar and their mixture. The oil shale was blended with hydrochar in the mass proportion of 10–90wt.% to study their co-combustion performance. The combustion performance of oil shale could be improved by blending with hydrochar. Obvious interactions existed between oil shale and hydrochar in relatively low temperature. The combustion process of hydrochar could be divided into two stages. While the combustion process of oil shale was only one stage. The activation energy of hydrochar and oil shale first decreased and then increased with the conversion degree rising. The average activation energy wasnot consistent with increasing the mass proportion of oil shale in the blends. When the percentage of oil shale in the mixtures was 70%, the average activation energy reached the minimum value, which was 98.5kJ/mol and 103.5kJ/mol obtained by Starink and Ozawa–Flynn–Wall method, respectively.
ISSN:1359-4311
DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.09.063