Loading…

Lightweight deep learning model for identifying tunnel lining defects based on GPR data

Existing lightweight artificial intelligence models for interpreting tunnel lining Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) data often suffer from inadequate accuracy and robustness owing to noise interference caused by in-tunnel infrastructure. This study introduces an optimised method, named MTGPR, for the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Automation in construction 2024-09, Vol.165, p.105506, Article 105506
Main Authors: Luo, Tess Xianghuan, Zhou, Yanfeng, Zheng, Qingzhou, Hou, Feifei, Lin, Cungang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Existing lightweight artificial intelligence models for interpreting tunnel lining Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) data often suffer from inadequate accuracy and robustness owing to noise interference caused by in-tunnel infrastructure. This study introduces an optimised method, named MTGPR, for the automatic detection of voids and cavities in tunnel linings based on GPR radargrams. The proposed model offers strengthened feature extraction and fusion owing to the use of CAPW-YOLO, a hybrid model aimed at enhancing accuracy in the presence of infrastructure interference. To address the shortage of high-quality training samples, an augmented dataset was generated by refining synthetic radargrams. Ablation experiments showcased that the proposed scheme attained an accuracy of 88.5% and a precision of 84.0%. In comparison to the baseline model, the proposed method exhibited a 46.9% increase in recognition speed and a 10.2% reduction in weight parameter quantity. Consequently, the proposed method advances identification accuracy whilst preserving lightweight and high-speed. •The optimised, lightweight deep-learning MTGPR method is presented.•The method detects subway tunnel lining voids and cavities using radargrams•Ablation experiments showed that this method yielded accuracy/precision: 88.5/84.0%.•MTGPR achieves enhanced performance in highly interfering noisy environments.
ISSN:0926-5805
DOI:10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105506