Loading…

Systematic review of anti-dsDNA testing for systemic lupus erythematosus: A meta-analysis of the diagnostic test specificity of an anti-dsDNA fluorescence enzyme immunoassay

The objective of this meta-analysis was to review the diagnostic performance of anti-dsDNA testing, to determine whether test specificity meets the revised 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The new criteria state that anti-dsDNA testing should be conducte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Autoimmunity reviews 2021-11, Vol.20 (11), p.102943, Article 102943
Main Authors: Orme, Michelle E., Voreck, Anja, Aksouh, Redha, Ramsey-Goldman, Rosalind, Schreurs, Marco W.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The objective of this meta-analysis was to review the diagnostic performance of anti-dsDNA testing, to determine whether test specificity meets the revised 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The new criteria state that anti-dsDNA testing should be conducted using “an immunoassay with demonstrated ≥ 90% specificity for SLE against relevant disease controls”. A systematic review (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and DARE) identified cross-sectional or case-control studies published January 2004 to August 2019, reporting anti-dsDNA test accuracy data. Studies included cases of SLE (confirmed using one or more of three validated SLE classification criteria sets) and a disease control group. Data were adjusted to exclude healthy controls. A hierarchical, bivariate mixed-effect meta-analysis of eligible quantitative studies was conducted in STATA MP v16.1 to produce a pooled estimate of sensitivity and specificity. The review identified six fluorescence immunoassay (FEIA) dsDNA studies (1977 total patients, of whom 47% had SLE) eligible to be included in quantitative meta-analysis and all reported a point estimate >90% for specificity. The meta-analysis estimated a pooled specificity of 94.7% (95% CI 91.67%–96.67%). The meta-analysis has demonstrated that the specificity of FEIA dsDNA is ≥90% for SLE, against relevant disease controls, and therefore performs in accordance with the 2019 classification criteria. •Testing of anti-dsDNA in SLE patients is crucial for disease classification and diagnosis.•The 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for SLE state the use of “an immunoassay with demonstrated ≥ 90% specificity” for anti-dsDNA testing.•A FEIA dsDNA test demonstrates the required ≥90% specificity in accordance with the SLE classification criteria.
ISSN:1568-9972
1568-9972
DOI:10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102943