Loading…

Effects of vinasse concentration on biogas production: An experimental work and case study in the context of RenovaBio in Brazil

Vinasse composition varies throughout the year, which may affect methane production. To assess the effects of the chemical oxygen demand (COD) on methane yield, we fed a reactor with increasing organic loading rates ranging from 1.15 to 4.56 g COD l−1 day−1. In the second part of this study, we comp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bioresource technology reports 2024-02, Vol.25, p.101698, Article 101698
Main Authors: Sica, Pietro, Marabesi, Amanda Olbrick, Seleghim, Aimee Regali, Das, K.C., Baptista, Antonio Sampaio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Vinasse composition varies throughout the year, which may affect methane production. To assess the effects of the chemical oxygen demand (COD) on methane yield, we fed a reactor with increasing organic loading rates ranging from 1.15 to 4.56 g COD l−1 day−1. In the second part of this study, we compared two scenarios for the state of Sao Paulo: 1) average vinasse COD; 2) ideal vinasse COD (38.8 g l−1). We found that the maximum methane yield was obtained at an OLR of 2.66, equivalent to a COD of 38.8 g l−1, and could increase the sugarcane mill energy production by 15.6 %. Considering the state of Sao Pauo, if all the vinasse was used to produce biogas, 3.9 million tons CO2eq (CBIOs) emission would be avoided yearly. Concentrating all the vinasse to the ideal COD would increase it by 3.2 %. Therefore, vinasse concentration would have little effects on a state-scale. [Display omitted] •Biomethane can increase sugarcane mill bioenergy production by 14.6 to 15.6 %.•Vinasse biogas in Sao Paulo can generate 3.9 million CBIOs per year.•However, concentrating vinasse would increase this value by only 3.2 %.
ISSN:2589-014X
2589-014X
DOI:10.1016/j.biteb.2023.101698