Ethnopharmacological study of Stryphnodendron rotundifolium in two communities in the semi-arid region of northeastern Brazil

• Published in: Revista brasileira de farmacognosia 2014-03, Vol.24 (2), p.124-132
• Main Authors: Oliveira, Dayanne Rakelly de, Júnior, Washington Soares Ferreira, Bitu, Vanessa de Carvalho Nilo, Pinheiro, Patricia Gonçalves, Menezes, Cicero Diego Almino, Junior, Francisco Elizaudo de Brito, Albuquerque, Ulysses Paulino de, Kerntopf, Marta Regina, Coutinho, Henrique Douglas Melo, Fachinetto, Roselei, Menezes, Irwin Rose Alencar
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Ethnobotany; Ethnopharmacology; Medicinal use; Stryphnodendron rotundifolium; Traditional Medicine
• ISSN: 0102-695X; 1981-528X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bjp.2014.03.003

This work describes the local knowledge of the medicinal use of Stryphnodendron rotundifolium Mart., Fabaceae, according to informants in two areas of the Araripe bioregion, in the Northeast Region of Brazil. We used interviews to investigate the ethnomedicinal use of the local species to determine the mode of use, frequency of administration, duration of treatment and restrictions of use. In traditional medicine, the use of S. rotundifolium is associated with the treatment of inflammatory and infectious diseases. The part of the plant most used was the stem bark (86.11%), the predominant mode of preparation was immersion in water (52.83%), and oral administration was the most cited (48.43%). For inflammatory and infectious diseases, the treatment lasted 3-10 days and the frequency of administration was 2-3 times/day. For gastroprotective effects, treatment lasted up to 30 days, and the herb was administered 1-3 times/day. For pain complaints, the therapy varied from 2-3 days to continuous administration. The informants (46.87%) did not mention restrictions of use, except for pregnant women, with a rate of 25%. A comparison of these results with the ethnopharmacological information from other studies showed that some of the traditional indications are scientifically supported by the literature or clinical studies. Nevertheless, the results showed that pharmacologists have not fully investigated all the possible bioactivities that healers credit to this plant.