Loading…

Urinary point-of-care test for smoking in the pre-operative assessment of patients undergoing elective plastic surgery

Self-reported information about smoking habit and cigarette consumption can be inaccurate and subject to bias in the clinical setting. Accurate assessment of a given smoking history at point-of-care is valuable. We describe the use of a comprehensive smoking questionnaire and the use of a disposable...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2006-01, Vol.59 (11), p.1156-1161
Main Authors: Payne, C.E., Southern, S.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Self-reported information about smoking habit and cigarette consumption can be inaccurate and subject to bias in the clinical setting. Accurate assessment of a given smoking history at point-of-care is valuable. We describe the use of a comprehensive smoking questionnaire and the use of a disposable biomarker test to verify and quantify the exposure to tobacco smoke. This point-of-care test (SmokeScreen ®) is a 6-min, easy-to-use urine test that measures nicotine and its breakdown products. One hundred consecutive patients attending plastic surgery pre-assessment clinic filled in the questionnaire and gave a consented urine sample. Qualitative and semi-quantitative assessment of tobacco consumption was observed by a simple sample colour change set against a standardised colorimetric chart for nicotine metabolite containing urine. The questionnaire self-reported smoking prevalence was 30% with 98% test specificity. The cotinine validated smoking prevalence was 54% with a 26% self-denial rate. Half the patients ( n = 15) who admitted smoking on the questionnaire underreported the amount they smoked daily, as quantified by biochemical measurement. Objective biochemical assessment shows that 26% of self-reporting non-smokers via self-completed questionnaire studies are actual smokers attending this pre-assessment clinic. When patients did report smoking there was consistent underreporting of cigarette consumption.
ISSN:1748-6815
1878-0539
DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2005.12.053