Loading…

Carbon sequestration under different organic amendments in saline-alkaline soils

•Biochar significantly increased the sequestration of SOC in saline soil.•Macroaggregate in organic fertilizer and straw were higher than that in biochar.•CMI values was greater in straw compared with organic fertilizer and biochar.•Organic amendments affected exchangeable cation distribution in agg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Catena (Giessen) 2021-01, Vol.196, p.104882, Article 104882
Main Authors: Wu, Lipeng, Zhang, Shirong, Ma, Ronghui, Chen, Mengmeng, Wei, Wenliang, Ding, Xiaodong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Biochar significantly increased the sequestration of SOC in saline soil.•Macroaggregate in organic fertilizer and straw were higher than that in biochar.•CMI values was greater in straw compared with organic fertilizer and biochar.•Organic amendments affected exchangeable cation distribution in aggregates. Organic amendments are a recyclable resource and can improve soil quality and carbon (C) sequestration, however, the difference in their effects on soil aggregate formation and C sequestration in saline-alkaline soils are less studied. We examined the effects of organic amendments to saline rice paddy fields with 4 treatments: (i) basal paddy soil (CK) lacking amendments (ii) organic fertilizer (OF) treatment at 910 kg C ha−1 from soybean litter and beans (iii) rice straw (RS) treatment at 3600 kg C ha−1 and (iv) rice straw-derived biochar (RS-biochar) treatment at 3600 kg C ha−1. All organic amendments significantly increased the soil organic C (SOC) stock in the 0–30 cm soil layer compared to CK. The SOC stock in the biochar treatment increased by 6.2 and 40.4% over the OF and RS amended treatments, respectively. This was most likely due to the greater levels of aromatic C in RS-biochar at 1.22 and 1.24 times greater than for the other organic amendments, respectively. Soil aggregates of 2–8 mm at 0–15 cm in the OF and RS amended soils were 38.3 and 58.2%, respectively, higher than that from the RS-biochar treatment. The mean weight diameter (MWD) in the OF and RS treatments were 35.4% and 45.8% higher than for the RS-biochar, respectively. MWD was significantly negatively correlated with soil exchangeable Na (p 
ISSN:0341-8162
1872-6887
DOI:10.1016/j.catena.2020.104882