Loading…

Electron-count control on adsorption upon reducible and irreducible clean metal-oxide surfaces

Two major chemical processes, acidobasic and redox, monitor the adsorption mechanism on metal oxides. Cations and anions of surfaces can be described as acid–base pairs. Thus, electron-rich molecules (Lewis bases) or anionic fragments formally arising from a heterolytic bond cleavage of molecule int...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Catalysis Today 2004-03, Vol.89 (3), p.269-278
Main Authors: Calatayud, M, Markovits, A, Minot, C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Two major chemical processes, acidobasic and redox, monitor the adsorption mechanism on metal oxides. Cations and anions of surfaces can be described as acid–base pairs. Thus, electron-rich molecules (Lewis bases) or anionic fragments formally arising from a heterolytic bond cleavage of molecule interact on the metal M n+ , while electron-poor ones (Lewis acids) interact on the oxygen one O 2−. In these cases, the electronic structure, insulating for the stoichiometric surface, is preserved upon adsorption. When the initial system does not favor an energy gap (open-shell adsorbates, defective surfaces), the best adsorption mode implies a redox mechanism and restores the situation of an insulator. In the case of open-shell adsorbates, an electron transfer to or from the oxide is a possible solution. The electron transfer occurs from the substrate to the adsorbate for an electronegative group (Cl adsorption on M n+ ) or the other way round for an electropositive one (NO adsorption on O). The reactivity at surfaces deviating from stoichiometric differs from that on the perfect ones, since the electron count is different. We will illustrate the previous concepts by the study of these adsorption processes on MgO and TiO 2 surfaces.
ISSN:0920-5861
1873-4308
DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2003.12.015