NiO-based ceramic structured catalysts for ethylene production: Substrates and active sites

• Published in: Catalysis today 2022-01, Vol.383, p.84-92
• Main Authors: Brussino, P., Banús, E.D., Ulla, M.A., Bortolozzi, J.P.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Ceramic paper; Ethylene; Foam; Monolith; NiO
• ISSN: 0920-5861; 1873-4308
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2020.09.005

[Display omitted] •NiO-Al2O3 based structured catalysts were tested in the ODH of ethane.•Three ceramic structures were used as substrates: a monolith, a foam and a paper.•Different NiO physicochemical properties were obtained within the substrates.•The systems with the stronger NiO-Al2O3 interactions were the most selective.•The addition of Ce generated a marked productivity increment. Structured catalysts have important advantages compared to powder formulations and they are required for processes intensification. In this work, three different ceramic structures: a cordierite monolith, an alumina foam and an alumina-silica paper were used as substrates for the deposition of a NiO-Al2O3 coating and tested in the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane to produce ethylene. For comparison, a NiO-Al2O3 powder catalyst was also prepared. Nickel oxide species with different physicochemical features were obtained over each structure, evidenced by morphological (SEM-EDX) and physicochemical characterization (XRD, LRS and XPS). The best distributions of the catalytic coatings and NiO physicochemical properties were obtained when the monolith and the foam were used as substrates. These led to higher NiO-Al2O3 interactions and consequently to high ethylene selectivity values, 70–90 %, corresponding to the former an ethane conversion of 22 % and to the latter a 5 %. The distribution of the active phase on the ceramic paper was heterogeneous, with NiO agglomerations and poor NiO-support interaction thus achieving low olefin selectivity (∼ 30 %). The addition of a second element such as cerium was also studied in those structured catalysts with high selectivity, resulting in both cases in an increment of ethane conversion but a decrease in ethylene selectivity. This behavior was attributed to the generation of electrophilic oxygen species.