Suicidal Obsessions or Suicidal Ideation? A Case Report and Practical Guide for Differential Assessment

•Suicidal obsessions (SO) can be challenging to distinguish from suicidal ideation (SI).•Inaccurate assessment of SO vs. SI can lead to inappropriate treatment.•We present a practical guide with a case example to help differentiate SO from SI.•We show how these differences functionally interrelate w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cognitive and behavioral practice 2024-05, Vol.31 (2), p.259-271
Main Authors: Mattera, Elizabeth F., Ching, Terence H.W., Zaboski, Brian A., Kichuk, Stephen A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
differential diagnosis
functional assessment
ideation
obsessions
suicide
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Suicidal obsessions (SO) can be challenging to distinguish from suicidal ideation (SI).•Inaccurate assessment of SO vs. SI can lead to inappropriate treatment.•We present a practical guide with a case example to help differentiate SO from SI.•We show how these differences functionally interrelate with each other in SO and SI. Suicidal obsessions (SO) can be challenging to distinguish from suicidal ideation (SI). This can be in part due to low familiarity with diverse presentations of OCD, as well as the limited scope of common measurement tools for assessing suicide-themed thoughts within a cognitive, affective, and behavioral framework. Inaccurate assessment increases the risk of misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment, which are critical to prevent. Therefore, we present a practical guide with a case example highlighting potential cognitive, affective, and behavioral criteria to consider in differentiating SO from SI, grounded upon a cognitive-behavioral framework and the extant literature regarding the phenomenology and assessment of OCD and suicidality. Through illustrative figures we also demonstrate examples of SO and SI with resulting cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses, and how they functionally interrelate with each other. We conclude with suggestions for future research validating the criteria provided in this guide. In summary, using this evidence-based guide to assess suicide-themed thoughts, emotions, and behaviors may help clinicians accurately distinguish between SO and SI, in turn optimizing interventions for their clients.
ISSN:1077-7229
1878-187X
DOI:10.1016/j.cbpra.2022.09.002