Loading…

Photocatalytic nitrate reduction over Pd–Cu/TiO2

[Display omitted] •Nitrate reduction in water is efficiently achieved by heterogeneous photocatalysis.•Significant photocatalytic activity is observed for TiO2 when modified with Pd–Cu.•In the presence of H2 or hole scavengers the catalyst performance increases.•When both H2 and CO2 were used the ni...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) Switzerland : 1996), 2014-09, Vol.251, p.123-130
Main Authors: Soares, O.S.G.P., Pereira, M.F.R., Órfão, J.J.M., Faria, J.L., Silva, C.G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[Display omitted] •Nitrate reduction in water is efficiently achieved by heterogeneous photocatalysis.•Significant photocatalytic activity is observed for TiO2 when modified with Pd–Cu.•In the presence of H2 or hole scavengers the catalyst performance increases.•When both H2 and CO2 were used the nitrate conversion is the highest.•The photocatalytic process is sensitive to the pH of the reaction medium. The extension of photocatalytic nitrate reduction in water by a 1%Pd–1%Cu (%wt) catalyst supported on TiO2 was evaluated under different reaction conditions. A series of electron sacrificial donors such as formic acid, oxalic acid, ethanol, methanol, and humic acid were used for inhibiting the mechanism of electron/hole recombination on the semiconductor by hole scavenging. In addition, the roles of H2 as reducing agent and CO2 as buffer are also discussed. The photocatalytic process is found to be more selective towards nitrogen than the dark catalytic process. Hole scavengers, or reducing H2 increase significantly the photocatalytic reduction of nitrate. Complete (100%) conversion was obtained when both H2 and CO2 were used as reducing and buffer agent, respectively. Among the hole scavengers tested, 0.08M formic acid solution represents the best compromise between nitrate conversion (84%) and nitrogen selectivity (83%).
ISSN:1385-8947
1873-3212
DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2014.04.030