Loading…

Electrochemical carbon monoxide reduction at high current density: Cell configuration matters

[Display omitted] •Electrocatalytic CO reduction activity is sensitive to electrochemical cell configuration.•Local chemical environment is different in the presence and absence of flowing catholyte.•Reduction products crossover to the anode due to imperfections in the ion exchange membrane.•Acetate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) Switzerland : 1996), 2024-06, Vol.490, p.151698, Article 151698
Main Authors: Monis Ayyub, Mohd, Kormányos, Attila, Endrődi, Balázs, Janáky, Csaba
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[Display omitted] •Electrocatalytic CO reduction activity is sensitive to electrochemical cell configuration.•Local chemical environment is different in the presence and absence of flowing catholyte.•Reduction products crossover to the anode due to imperfections in the ion exchange membrane.•Acetate selectivity depends on electrolyte pH and concentration of alkali metal cations. Electrochemical carbon monoxide reduction (COR) is an important link between the electrochemical CO2-to-CO reduction technology and the renewable production of C2+ chemicals. Along with the development of catalyst materials for selective and efficient COR, it is imperative to optimize electrolysis conditions and cell parameters to efficiently reduce CO at industrially relevant current density and produce concentrated product streams. This study focuses on understanding fundamental differences in reaction selectivity during COR, when the same Cu catalyst was used in three different cell configurations, namely, microfluidic, hybrid anode zero-gap, and zero-gap electrolysers. In all cases, ethylene, acetate, ethanol, and propanol formation was confirmed at industrially relevant current densities (0.5–1.2 A cm−2) at reasonable cell voltages, albeit with subtle differences. The local chemical environment at the electrode/electrolyte interface is very different in each configuration leading to different product distribution and product crossover to the anode. This stresses the importance of cell architecture and implies that comparing the catalytic activity of a catalyst studied with different cell configurations can lead to inconsistent conclusions.
ISSN:1385-8947
DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2024.151698