Impact of atmospheric plasma spraying parameters on microstructure, mechanical properties and thermal cycling performance of YSZ coatings

• Published in: Ceramics international 2024-12, Vol.50 (24), p.53976-53986
• Main Authors: Tahir, Muhammad, Qasim, Muhammad, Ahmed, Nisar, Satti, Aamir Naseem, Malik, Anwaar Ellahi, Khan, Zuhair S., Anwar, Mustafa
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Atmospheric plasma spray; Microstructure; Porosity; Vickers hardness; Yttria-stabilized zirconia
• ISSN: 0272-8842
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.10.253

Yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) coatings are widely utilized thermal protective layers for metal and superalloy surfaces. These coatings are employed as thermal barrier coating (TBCs) to insulate metallic parts from higher thermal energy, thereby minimizing the cooling need for the topcoat ceramic layer. The choice of material is 7 wt% YSZ due to its exceptional capability to withstand challenging conditions characterized by extremely high temperatures and pressures, typically employed by the atmospheric plasma spraying (APS) in gas turbines, effectively extending their lifespan and improving performance. The deposition process of TBCs is significantly influenced by various spraying parameters, including gas flow rate and current (amp). These key parameters mutually play a significant role in controlling thermal stability, phase composition, and improved mechanical and microstructure properties. The aim of this research is to evaluate and contrast the impact of various spraying parameters on YSZ TBC performance. Accordingly, the influence of Hydrogen (H2), Argon (Ar) flow rate, and Current (amp) was investigated. Microstructure and elemental mapping studying was conducted using Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy FESEM/EDS and phase studying was examined with X-ray diffraction (XRD). Porosity was measured by IMAGE J software while hardness measurement was calculated by Vickers hardness tester. Additionally, thermal cycling tests were conducted between 700 °C and 1200 °C. The porous coatings exhibited poor performance, delaminating early during the tests. In contrast, dense coatings performed significantly better, enduring up to 140 cycles before failure.