Loading…
Detection of insect damaged rice grains using visible and near infrared hyperspectral imaging technique
The visible near infrared hyperspectral imaging systems (HIS) with a xenon light source, Pika XC2 camera having a spectral range of 400–1100 nm, and a SpectrononPro software was used for the hypercube data visualization of the fresh and the damaged rice grains. The linear assembly of stage control...
Saved in:
Published in: | Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems 2022-02, Vol.221, p.104489, Article 104489 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The visible near infrared hyperspectral imaging systems (HIS) with a xenon light source, Pika XC2 camera having a spectral range of 400–1100 nm, and a SpectrononPro software was used for the hypercube data visualization of the fresh and the damaged rice grains. The linear assembly of stage control was set with a scanning speed of 0.79 cm/s, homing speed of 0.77 cm/s, and a stepping mode of 0.60 cm/s. The captured images in the form of RGB data cubes were modified in MATLAB 2017a to gray image, and then further to a binary image. Dimensional reduction using PCA was at first applied to the range of wavelengths of 396.16 nm–1003.71 nm to obtain the first and second principal component versus wavelength graphs. The images were then cropped and masked in MATLAB to get first versus second principal component plots for both damaged and healthy rice grains. The first and second principal components have a mean value of 699.9 nm, and a mode value of 396.2 nm in the case of fresh rice grains, and a mean value of 700.1 nm, and a mode value of 396.2 nm for the damaged rice grains. The cropping of the images was then at significant wavelengths of 904.07, 914.90, 646.32, and 725.38 nm for the fresh rice grains, while 910.57, 916.49, 691.80, and 852.63 nm for the damaged rice grains respectively. The standard error reported for the fresh rice on the X-axis (XF) and Y-axis (YF) was 1.34 (XF), and 0.17 (YF), while for the damaged rice was 1.15 (XI), and 0.15 (YI) respectively. Therefore, it can be affirmed that the prediction or distinction of rice on the basis of fresh and damaged ones can be done with ease. Further, this approach can be applied to unknown samples to detect insect infestation in rice.
•Visible near infrared hyperspectral imaging systems was used for detection of rice.•Dimensional reduction using PCA was done at wavelengths of 396.16–1003.71 nm.•The images were cropped and masked in MATLAB to get 1st vs 2nd principal component.•The standard error for fresh rice was 1.34 while for damaged was 1.15•Distinction of fresh and damaged rice was done with ease. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0169-7439 1873-3239 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.chemolab.2021.104489 |