Kinetic performance comparison of superficially porous, fully porous and monolithic reversed-phase columns by gradient kinetic plots for the separation of protein biopharmaceuticals

• Published in: Journal of Chromatography A 2022-08, Vol.1676, p.463251, Article 463251
• Main Authors: Jaag, Simon, Wen, Chunmei, Peters, Benjamin, Lämmerhofer, Michael
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Core shell particle; Fully porous particle; Gradient kinetic plots; Monolithic columns; UHPLC
• ISSN: 0021-9673
• DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2022.463251

•Kinetic performance comparison of protein reversed-phase columns.•Model proteins of various size, NISTmAb and NISTmAb fragments as test analytes.•Core-shell, fully porous & monolithic columns compared using gradient kinetic plots.•Kinetic plots allow convenient comparison in terms of speed or max. plate numbers.•400/450 Å core-shell columns showed the best performance due to a thin shell. To find the best performing column for the analysis of protein-based biopharmaceuticals is a significant challenge as meanwhile numerous modern columns with distinct stationary phase morphologies are available for reversed-phase liquid chromatography. Especially when besides morphology also several other column factors are different, it is hard to decide about the best performing column a priori. To cope with this problem, in the present work 13 different reversed-phase columns dedicated for protein separations were systematically tested by the gradient kinetic plot method. A comprehensive comparison of columns with different morphologies (monolithic, fully porous and superficially porous particle columns), particle sizes and pore diameters as well as column length was performed. Specific consideration was also given to various monolithic columns which recently shifted a bit out of the prime focus in the scientific literature. The test proteins ranged from small proteins starting from 12 kDa, to medium sized proteins (antibody subunits obtained after IdeS-digestion and disulphide reduction) and an intact antibody. The small proteins cytochrome c, lysozyme and β-lactoglobulin could be analysed with similar performance by the best columns of all three column morphologies while for the antibody fragments specific fully porous and superficially porous particle columns were superior. A 450 Å 3,5 µm superficially porous particle column showed the best performance for the intact antibody while a 1.7 µm fully porous particle column with 300 Å showed equivalent performance to the best superficially porous column with thin shell and 400 Å pore size for proteins between 12 and 25 kDa. While the majority of the columns had C4 bonding chemistry, the silica monolith with C18 bonding and 300 Å mesopore size approximated the best performing particle columns and outperformed a C4 300 Å wide-pore monolith. The current work can support the preferred choice for the most suitable reversed-phase column for protein separations.