Binary gas sorption/desorption experiments on a bituminous coal: Simultaneous measurements on sorption kinetics, volumetric strain and acoustic emission

• Published in: International journal of coal geology 2009-01, Vol.77 (1), p.90-102
• Main Authors: Majewska, Zofia, Ceglarska-Stefańska, Grażyna, Majewski, Stanisław, Ziętek, Jerzy
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Carbon dioxide; CO 2 sequestration/ECBM recovery; Methane; Swelling/shrinkage of coal
• ISSN: 0166-5162; 1872-7840
• DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2008.09.009

There is still no clear understanding of the specific interactions between coal and gas molecules. In this context sorption–desorption studies of methane and carbon dioxide, both in a single gas environment and gas mixtures, are of fundamental interest. This paper presents the results of unique simultaneous measurements of sorption kinetics, volumetric strain and acoustic emission (AE) on three tetragonal coal samples subjected to sorption of carbon dioxide and methane mixtures. The coal was a high volatile bituminous C coal taken from the Budryk mine in the Upper Silesia Basin, Poland. Three different gas mixtures were used in the sorption tests, with dominant CO 2, with dominant CH 4 and a 50/50 mixture. The experimental set-up was designed specially for this study. It consisted of three individual units working together: (i) a unit for gas sorption experiments using a volumetric method, (ii) an AE apparatus for detecting, recording and analysing AE, and (iii) a strain meter for measuring strains induced in the coal sample by gas sorption/desorption. All measurements were computer aided. The experiments indicated that the coal tested showed preferential sorption of CH 4 at 2.6 MPa pressure and exhibited comparable affinities for CH 4 and CO 2 at higher pressures (4.0 MPa). The results of chromatographic analysis of the gas released on desorption suggested that the desorption of methane from the coal was favoured. The relationship between the volumetric strain and the amount of sorbed gas was found to be non-linear. These results were contrary to common opinions on the coal behaviour. Furthermore, it appeared that the swelling/shrinkage of coal was clearly influenced by the network of fractures. Besides, the AE and strain characteristics suggested common sources of sorption induced AE and strain. The present results may have implications for the sequestration of carbon dioxide in coal seams and enhanced coalbed methane recovery (ECBM).