Loading…
Factors predictive of roof instability in addition to the existing CMRR criteria at two case study coal mines
This work uses two underground longwall coal mines located in the Western US (Mines A and B) as case studies to investigate which parameters are indicative of roof fall potential, and whether the Coal Mine Roof Rating (CMRR) is predictive of stability at these mines. Data were collected at 30 sites...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of coal geology 2019-09, Vol.213, p.103255, Article 103255 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This work uses two underground longwall coal mines located in the Western US (Mines A and B) as case studies to investigate which parameters are indicative of roof fall potential, and whether the Coal Mine Roof Rating (CMRR) is predictive of stability at these mines. Data were collected at 30 sites in each mine. These data sets included the CMRR, a record of the roof stability and a series of non-CMRR parameters thought to also be potentially indicative of roof stability but which are not included in the CMRR. These data were then statistically analyzed for correlation between CMRR and roof stability. The CMRR was found to be moderately effective at Mine A but not effective at Mine B. At Mine A, faulting was found to be the primary control on roof stability. Topographic curvature, slope angle and depth of cover were found to have reasonable predictive capability for assessment of roof stability category at Mine B based on a logistic regression analysis.
These differences in roof stability controls are likely due, at least in part, to the unusual topography above Mine B, with differential erosion resulting in a landscape of flat plateaus and sharp river valleys. It is likely that these sudden changes in slope and topography lead to in-situ stress rotation and the development of shear stresses near the excavation at Mine B. This, combined with a lack of major discontinuities such as slickensides, which are central to the CMRR system, explains why the CMRR is much less effective at predicting roof stability at Mine B compared to Mine A.
•Excavation span, topographic effects/stress & depth of cover = additional controls•Few localized discontinuities or steep/varied topography mean the CMRR may not apply.•The CMRR is more applicable to mines with a high incidence of localized faulting. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0166-5162 1872-7840 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.coal.2019.103255 |