Slope stability machine learning predictions on spatially variable random fields with and without factor of safety calculations

Random field Monte Carlo (MC) reliability analysis is a robust stochastic method to determine the probability of failure. This method, however, requires a large number of numerical simulations demanding high computational costs. This paper explores the efficiency of machine learning (ML) models and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computers and geotechnics 2023-01, Vol.153, p.105094, Article 105094
Main Authors: Aminpour, Mohammad, Alaie, Reza, Khosravi, Sajjad, Kardani, Navid, Moridpour, Sara, Nazem, Majidreza
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anisotropy
Heterogeneity
Machine learning
Monte Carlo
Slope stability
Surrogate models
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Random field Monte Carlo (MC) reliability analysis is a robust stochastic method to determine the probability of failure. This method, however, requires a large number of numerical simulations demanding high computational costs. This paper explores the efficiency of machine learning (ML) models and Artificial Neural Networks used as surrogate models trained on a limited number of random field slope stability simulations in predicting the results of large datasets. The paper explores the efficiency of the predictions on the probability of failure using databases with and without factor of safety (FOS) computations. An extensive range of soil heterogeneity and anisotropy is examined on unstratified and layered slopes. On datasets requiring only the examination of failure or non-failure class of slopes (without FOSs), the performance of ML classification of the random field slope stability results generally reduces with higher anisotropy and heterogeneity of the soil. However, using the probability summation method proposed here, ML prediction of the probability of failure is shown to be highly accurate for the whole range of soil heterogeneity and anisotropy. The errors in the predicted probability of failure using 5% of MC data is only 0.46% in average for the prediction of the remaining unseen 95% of data. Offering such accuracies, the approach accelerates the computations for about 100 folds. The models also proved similarly efficient in predicting FOSs for stratified random field anisotropic heterogenous slopes.
ISSN:0266-352X
1873-7633
DOI:10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.105094