Loading…

Bond strength, failure criteria and calculation methods for adhesively bonded timber–concrete composites

The bond strength of adhesively bonded timber–concrete composites (ATCC) with prefabricated concrete elements is usually described using the shear strength of the timber. This approach, however, often fails to consider the actual failure modes of the bondline and also the interaction between shear s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Construction & building materials 2024-04, Vol.423, p.135651, Article 135651
Main Authors: Frohnmüller, Jens, Seim, Werner
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The bond strength of adhesively bonded timber–concrete composites (ATCC) with prefabricated concrete elements is usually described using the shear strength of the timber. This approach, however, often fails to consider the actual failure modes of the bondline and also the interaction between shear stresses and stresses perpendicular to the bondline has not yet been comprehensively understood. To address this limitation, a reliable calculation method is required, where stress determination, failure criterion, and stress analysis are clearly defined to accurately predict the bond failure of ATCC specimens. In this study, three linear-elastic calculation methods and one non-linear calculation method are presented along with corresponding failure criteria and strength parameters. Regarding validation, the predicted failure load is compared to experimental results from 186 ATCC bond specimens to assess the method’s suitability. Based on the findings, appropriate calculation methods for a reliable prediction of the bond strength are recommended. Calculation method FE-C: Top: Methodology for the prediction of the failure load, exemplary depicted in the load–displacement diagram. Middle: Development of the damage parameter D with exemplary related crack surface of bond test V3-0. Bottom: Results of the experimental tests compared to the predicted failure load. [Display omitted]
ISSN:0950-0618
1879-0526
DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135651