Loading…
Classification tree analysis using TARGET
Tree models are valuable tools for predictive modeling and data mining. Traditional tree-growing methodologies such as CART are known to suffer from problems including greediness, instability, and bias in split rule selection. Alternative tree methods, including Bayesian CART (Chipman et al., 1998;...
Saved in:
Published in: | Computational statistics & data analysis 2008, Vol.52 (3), p.1362-1372 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Tree models are valuable tools for predictive modeling and data mining. Traditional tree-growing methodologies such as CART are known to suffer from problems including greediness, instability, and bias in split rule selection. Alternative tree methods, including Bayesian CART (Chipman et al., 1998; Denison et al., 1998), random forests (Breiman, 2001a), bootstrap bumping (Tibshirani and Knight, 1999), QUEST (Loh and Shih, 1997), and CRUISE (Kim and Loh, 2001), have been proposed to resolve these issues from various aspects, but each has its own drawbacks.
Gray and Fan (2003) described a genetic algorithm approach to constructing decision trees called tree analysis with randomly generated and evolved trees (TARGET) that performs a better search of the tree model space and largely resolves the problems with current tree modeling techniques. Utilizing the Bayesian information criterion (
BIC), Fan and Gray (2005) developed a version of TARGET for regression tree analysis. In this article, we consider the construction of classification trees using TARGET. We modify the
BIC to handle a categorical response variable, but we also adjust its penalty component to better account for the model complexity of TARGET. We also incorporate the option of splitting rules based on linear combinations of two or three variables in TARGET, which greatly improves the prediction accuracy of TARGET trees. Comparisons of TARGET to existing methods, using simulated and real data sets, indicate that TARGET has advantages over these other approaches. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-9473 1872-7352 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.csda.2007.03.014 |