Loading…
Classifying the clique-width of H-free bipartite graphs
Let G be a bipartite graph, and let H be a bipartite graph with a fixed bipartition (BH,WH). We consider three different, natural ways of forbidding H as an induced subgraph in G. First, G is H-free if it does not contain H as an induced subgraph. Second, G is strongly H-free if no bipartition...
Saved in:
Published in: | Discrete Applied Mathematics 2016-02, Vol.200, p.43-51 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Let G be a bipartite graph, and let H be a bipartite graph with a fixed bipartition (BH,WH). We consider three different, natural ways of forbidding H as an induced subgraph in G. First, G is H-free if it does not contain H as an induced subgraph. Second, G is strongly H-free if no bipartition of G contains an induced copy of H in a way that respects the bipartition of H. Third, G is weakly H-free if G has at least one bipartition that does not contain an induced copy of H in a way that respects the bipartition of H. Lozin and Volz characterized all bipartite graphs H for which the class of strongly H-free bipartite graphs has bounded clique-width. We extend their result by giving complete classifications for the other two variants of H-freeness. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0166-218X 1872-6771 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.dam.2015.06.030 |