Loading…
Increasing Conservation Efficiency While Maintaining Distributive Goals With the Payment for Environmental Services
A key challenge in designing Payment for Environmental Services (PES) programs is to balance conservation efficiency with equity where, typically, decision makers do not have practical and quantitative tools to consider the possible trade-offs. Here, we propose a policy-relevant and implementable ‘w...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecological economics 2019-02, Vol.156, p.202-210 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | A key challenge in designing Payment for Environmental Services (PES) programs is to balance conservation efficiency with equity where, typically, decision makers do not have practical and quantitative tools to consider the possible trade-offs. Here, we propose a policy-relevant and implementable ‘win-settle’ model that allows PES decision makers to maximize efficiency while considering the distributive equity associated with beneficiary payments. To demonstrate our approach, we calibrate the model to a current PES program in Vietnam that has one of the world's most comprehensive and self-sustained payment schemes for forest conservation. The results indicate that our approach could generate a substantial improvement relative to current methods. In other words, for the same expenditure and identical horizontal equity in payments to beneficiaries, more forest could be conserved, and with a lower administrative burden.
•A model to quantify the trade-off between efficiency and equity in PES•PES design that assists policymakers to achieve stated efficiency and equity goals•Application of PES design principles to Vietnam's forest conservation program•Demonstration of conservation benefits from a redesigned PES |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0921-8009 1873-6106 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.10.003 |