Loading…

Increasing Conservation Efficiency While Maintaining Distributive Goals With the Payment for Environmental Services

A key challenge in designing Payment for Environmental Services (PES) programs is to balance conservation efficiency with equity where, typically, decision makers do not have practical and quantitative tools to consider the possible trade-offs. Here, we propose a policy-relevant and implementable ‘w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological economics 2019-02, Vol.156, p.202-210
Main Authors: Chu, Long, Quentin Grafton, R., Keenan, Rodney
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A key challenge in designing Payment for Environmental Services (PES) programs is to balance conservation efficiency with equity where, typically, decision makers do not have practical and quantitative tools to consider the possible trade-offs. Here, we propose a policy-relevant and implementable ‘win-settle’ model that allows PES decision makers to maximize efficiency while considering the distributive equity associated with beneficiary payments. To demonstrate our approach, we calibrate the model to a current PES program in Vietnam that has one of the world's most comprehensive and self-sustained payment schemes for forest conservation. The results indicate that our approach could generate a substantial improvement relative to current methods. In other words, for the same expenditure and identical horizontal equity in payments to beneficiaries, more forest could be conserved, and with a lower administrative burden. •A model to quantify the trade-off between efficiency and equity in PES•PES design that assists policymakers to achieve stated efficiency and equity goals•Application of PES design principles to Vietnam's forest conservation program•Demonstration of conservation benefits from a redesigned PES
ISSN:0921-8009
1873-6106
DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.10.003