Loading…
The effects of productivity and benefits on unemployment: Breaking the link
In the standard macroeconomic search and matching model of the labor market, there is a tight link between the quantitative effects of (i) aggregate productivity shocks on unemployment and (ii) unemployment benefits on unemployment. This tight link is at odds with the empirical literature. We show t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Economic modelling 2021-01, Vol.94, p.967-980 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In the standard macroeconomic search and matching model of the labor market, there is a tight link between the quantitative effects of (i) aggregate productivity shocks on unemployment and (ii) unemployment benefits on unemployment. This tight link is at odds with the empirical literature. We show that a two-sided model of labor market search where the household and firm decisions are decomposed into job offers, job acceptances, firing, and quits can break this link. In such a model, unemployment benefits affect households' behavior directly, without having to run via the bargained wage. A calibration of the model based on U.S. JOLTS data generates both a solid amplification of productivity shocks and a moderate effect of benefits on unemployment. Our analysis shows the importance of investigating the effects of policies on the households' work incentives and the firms' employment incentives within the search process.
•This paper breaks the tight link between the effect of aggregate productivity and benefits on unemployment.•We use a labor market flow model that disentangles job offers, job acceptances, firings and quits.•The model is calibrated to JOLTS data.•The simulated model shows strong amplification and a moderate effect of benefits on unemployment.•The labor market model can be used to analyze the effects of different labor market policies. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0264-9993 1873-6122 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.econmod.2020.02.037 |