Loading…

Employee treatment and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from China

This study examines whether and how employee treatment affects corporate investment efficiency. Using a sample of Chinese listed firms from 2010 to 2020, we provide evidence that employee-friendly treatment leads to increased investment efficiency. To bolster a causal interpretation of this finding,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Economic modelling 2023-11, Vol.128, p.106484, Article 106484
Main Authors: Wang, Maochuan, Yan, Youliang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study examines whether and how employee treatment affects corporate investment efficiency. Using a sample of Chinese listed firms from 2010 to 2020, we provide evidence that employee-friendly treatment leads to increased investment efficiency. To bolster a causal interpretation of this finding, we further leverage instrumental variable approaches, difference-in-differences strategies, and multiple fixed effects. Moreover, improving internal control and mitigating financing constraints are two plausible channels through which employee treatment facilitates investment efficiency. Cross-sectionally, the documented effect is more pronounced for firms with high employee quality, R&D-intensive firms, and those operating in competitive industries. Collectively, our study sheds light on an unintended consequence of employee treatment policies on corporate investment decision-making, providing important implications for business practices. •We investigate the effect of employee treatment on investment efficiency.•We utilize data from Chinese listed firms during 2010–2020.•Employee-friendly treatment improves investment efficiency.•Internal control and financing constraints are two economic channels.•Employee quality, R&D intensity, and industry competition moderate the impact.
ISSN:0264-9993
DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106484