Why ‘blended finance’ could help transitions to sustainable landscapes: Lessons from the Unlocking Forest Finance project

•Innovative financing mechanisms for sustainable landscape are needed.•The risk-return profile from investments in sustainable land use rarely meet private investor demand.•Environmental impacts need to be safeguarded at farm-level and landscape-level.•‘Blended Finance’ models could help finance tra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecosystem services 2019-06, Vol.37, p.100917, Article 100917
Main Authors: Rode, Julian, Pinzon, Alexandra, Stabile, Marcelo C.C., Pirker, Johannes, Bauch, Simone, Iribarrem, Alvaro, Sammon, Paul, Llerena, Carlos A., Muniz Alves, Lincoln, Orihuela, Carlos E., Wittmer, Heidi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biodiversity conservation
Blended finance
Green investment
Sustainability transition
Sustainable landscapes
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Innovative financing mechanisms for sustainable landscape are needed.•The risk-return profile from investments in sustainable land use rarely meet private investor demand.•Environmental impacts need to be safeguarded at farm-level and landscape-level.•‘Blended Finance’ models could help finance transitions to sustainable landscapes. There is a momentum towards finding financing solutions for halting deforestation at the landscape level for the benefit of climate, biodiversity and delivery of ecosystem services. The Unlocking Forest Finance (UFF) project has, between 2013 and 2018, worked on the development of innovative financing mechanisms for sustainable landscapes in three sub-national Amazon regions of Brazil (Acre and Mato Grosso) and Peru (San Martín). This paper describes the approach of the UFF project as a case study of sustainable landscape financing, and portrays the key evolutions during the process. Relying on a reflection and consultation process among project partners, the paper then derives a set of lessons for sustainable landscape finance. It illustrates the current mismatch between the demand side of private ‘impact’ investors (i.e., those who look for social and environmental impact of investments beyond financial return) and the supply side of sustainable land use investments on the ground. The paper discusses how ‘blended finance’ models that combine funding from commercial, public, and philanthropic sources could contribute to financing sustainable landscapes.
ISSN:2212-0416
2212-0416
DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100917