Loading…

Infant and teacher dialogue in education and care: A pedagogical imperative

•We examine infant–teacher dialogue using dialogic methodologies.•Spoken and unspoken dialogue is central to infant pedagogy in early years settings.•Infant dialogue takes place within and beyond the immediate social setting.•The nature of both infant and adult initiations influence the response. Th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Early childhood research quarterly 2015, Vol.30, p.160-173
Main Authors: White, E.J., Peter, M., Redder, B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•We examine infant–teacher dialogue using dialogic methodologies.•Spoken and unspoken dialogue is central to infant pedagogy in early years settings.•Infant dialogue takes place within and beyond the immediate social setting.•The nature of both infant and adult initiations influence the response. This exploratory study investigated the nature of teacher–infant social dialogue in a high-quality education and care centre in New Zealand. Employing dialogic methodology (Bakhtin, 1986), interactions between infants and teachers were analysed in terms of the language forms used in the social event. Polyphonic video footage of two infants’ social experiences and subsequent teacher interviews were coded to identify forms of language that occurred in dialogues and their interpreted pedagogical significance to teachers. The results revealed four central features of teacher–infant social exchange: (i) infants were more likely to respond to teachers interaction initiations when teachers used verbal and non-verbal language form combinations; (ii) when initiations were verbal and non-verbal combinations, both teachers’ and infants’ responses were significantly more likely to be also combinations of verbal and non-verbal language forms; (iii) both infants and teachers altered their responses to the language forms used by the initiator regardless of whether that was an infant or a teacher; and (iv) when teachers did not respond, they had a pedagogical rationale. Results highlight the multi-voiced and synchronous nature of teacher–infant interactions, the complex nature of communication in a formal out-of-home setting, and the pedagogical nature of teacher dialogue with infants.
ISSN:0885-2006
1873-7706
DOI:10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.10.008