Loading…

Exogenous electric field as a biochemical driving factor for extracellular electron transfer: Increasing power output of microbial fuel cell

[Display omitted] •Exogenous electric field enhances extracellular electron transfer.•EEF promotes the formation of electrochemically active sites within the biofilm.•The EET rate of biofilms was quantitatively analyzed using the SECM.•The EET rate constant of the SD-MFC-MEC was 2.25 times that of t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy conversion and management 2024-02, Vol.301, p.118050, Article 118050
Main Authors: Liu, Hongzhou, Chen, Tiezhu, Li, Jianchang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[Display omitted] •Exogenous electric field enhances extracellular electron transfer.•EEF promotes the formation of electrochemically active sites within the biofilm.•The EET rate of biofilms was quantitatively analyzed using the SECM.•The EET rate constant of the SD-MFC-MEC was 2.25 times that of the R-MFC. Although microbial fuel cells (MFCs) offer a promising avenue for clean power production, they are hindered by inefficient extracellular electron transfer (EET), thereby resulting in a low power output. This study focused on augmenting MFC power by boosting the EET rate using an exogenous electric field (EEF). By leveraging the dual benefits of microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) in organic waste treatment and energy recovery, we developed an MFC–MEC system that utilizes the EEF from MEC as a connecting link. Two configurations, EEF in the same direction (SD-MFC–MEC) and EEF in the reverse direction (RD-MFC–MEC), were used to examine the EET kinetic rate at the MFC anode in the EEF environment using various electrochemical methods for quantitative evaluation. Our findings revealed that EEF significantly enhanced MFC anode biofilm formation and electrochemical activity, leading to a prominent improvement in electrode reaction rates. The EET rate constants in the SD-MFC–MEC and RD-MFC–MEC were more than double those in the control R-MFC, with power density increases of 117.8% and 108.4%, respectively. The formation of electrochemically active sites within the biofilm induced by EEF has emerged as a crucial factor in amplifying the EET rate, and consequently, the MFC power output. Additionally, the variation in EET rate constants between the SD-MFC–MEC and RD-MFC–MEC was minimal, thereby indicating the negligible impact of the EEF orientation on the EET efficiency. This study provides a novel method for quantitatively examining EET rates, opens up new avenues for further facilitating microbe-to-electrode electron transfer, and promotes the application of MFC–MEC systems in energy recovery, CO2 emission reduction, and waste treatment.
ISSN:0196-8904
1879-2227
DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2023.118050