Loading…
Sequential and batch data assimilation approaches to cope with groundwater model error: An empirical evaluation
Groundwater model data assimilation (DA) aims to reduce uncertainty in simulated outcomes of interest to resource management while minimizing the potential for predictive bias. Sequential DA, which can estimate model states along with properties and stresses dynamically in time, offers a potentially...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental modelling & software : with environment data news 2022-10, Vol.156, p.105498, Article 105498 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Groundwater model data assimilation (DA) aims to reduce uncertainty in simulated outcomes of interest to resource management while minimizing the potential for predictive bias. Sequential DA, which can estimate model states along with properties and stresses dynamically in time, offers a potentially powerful alternative to batch DA (i.e., history matching) for reducing bias in decision-relevant predictions in the presence of incorrect model structure and/or processes. This study evaluates the ability of batch and sequential DA approaches to history match and forecast simulated quantities in the presence of model error using a novel ensemble-based paired complex–simple approach that enables the incorporation of stochastic uncertainty and a statistical evaluation of predictive bias. Our findings have implications for groundwater decision support modeling as they underscore the pitfalls of fixing parameters and forcing variables a priori and present a proof of concept for using adjustable model states to cope with model error.
•Batch and sequential data assimilation are evaluated in the presence of model error.•We develop an enhanced paired complex–simple approach to statistically evaluate bias.•We present a proof of concept for using adjustable states to cope with model error. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1364-8152 1873-6726 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105498 |