Loading…
Exergy analysis of a holistic zero waste macroalgae-based third-generation bioethanol biorefinery approach: Biowaste to bioenergy
This paper evaluates the thermodynamic performance of three different bioethanol biorefinery scenarios, utilizing macroalgae waste, namely Eucheuma denticulatum residues (EDRs), as raw materials. The composition of EDRs was determined as cellulose (97.66%), protein (0.75%), ash (1.52%), and oil (0.0...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental technology & innovation 2023-05, Vol.30, p.103089, Article 103089 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This paper evaluates the thermodynamic performance of three different bioethanol biorefinery scenarios, utilizing macroalgae waste, namely Eucheuma denticulatum residues (EDRs), as raw materials. The composition of EDRs was determined as cellulose (97.66%), protein (0.75%), ash (1.52%), and oil (0.07%). To establish exergy analysis, the thermodynamic properties of each biorefinery scenario were obtained through process simulation using Aspen Plus V12.1. In all three scenarios, it was concluded that most exergy losses occurred in the recovery unit, cellulase production unit, and combined heat and power (CHP) unit. In contrast, the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation reactor was identified as the most efficient unit, exhibiting the highest exergy efficiency (72.75%) in Scenario 1 and 73.74% in Scenario 2 and 3. Scenario 3, with the universal exergy efficiency of 49.22%, was determined as the lowest exergy efficiency in all scenarios due to the high exergy degradation rate found in Scenario 3. However, the lowest normalized exergy destruction rate of 3.32% and highest functional exergy efficiency of 15.3% were found in Scenario 3, which illustrated that Scenario 3 had the highest sustainability among the three scenarios. The greatest functionality and sustainability in Scenario 3 were mainly due to the “zero-waste” design by implementing a CHP and wastewater treatment units to process the waste streams further and produce value-added components simultaneously.
•3G bioethanol production from macroalgae waste was evaluated thermodynamically.•Raw materials demand was reduced with MAH pre-treatment.•Bioethanol purify and recovery unit was determined as the exergy hotspot.•Scenario 3 had the highest functional exergy efficiency of 15.3%.•The normalized exergy destruction of Scenario 3 was determined as 3.32.
[Display omitted] |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2352-1864 2352-1864 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.eti.2023.103089 |