Artificial surveillance cues do not increase generosity: two meta-analyses

Abstract Many studies have seemingly demonstrated that anonymous individuals who are shown artificial cues of being watched behave as if they are being watched by real people. However, several studies have failed to replicate this surveillance cue effect. In light of these mixed results, we conducte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Evolution and human behavior 2017-01, Vol.38 (1), p.144-153
Main Authors: Northover, Stefanie B, Pedersen, William C, Cohen, Adam B, Andrews, Paul W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cues of being watched
Eyespots
Generosity
Meta-analysis
Observation cues
Psychiatry
Surveillance cues
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Many studies have seemingly demonstrated that anonymous individuals who are shown artificial cues of being watched behave as if they are being watched by real people. However, several studies have failed to replicate this surveillance cue effect. In light of these mixed results, we conducted two meta-analyses investigating the effect of artificial observation cues on generosity. Overall, our meta-analyses found no evidence to support the claim that artificial surveillance cues increase generosity, either by increasing how generous individuals are, or by increasing the probability that individuals will show any generosity at all. Therefore, surveillance cue effects should be interpreted cautiously.
ISSN:1090-5138
1879-0607
DOI:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.07.001