Bringing resilience-thinking into water governance: Two illustrative case studies from South Africa and Cambodia

• Published in: Global environmental change 2022-07, Vol.75, p.102542, Article 102542
• Main Authors: Fallon, A., Jones, R.W., Keskinen, M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Complexity; Limpopo; Mekong; Resilience; Social-ecological systems; Transformation
• ISSN: 0959-3780; 1872-9495
• DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102542

•Resilience-thinking embraces complexity in water–society relations but misses power.•Theoretical multiplicity links social-ecological systems, resilience and governance.•Resilience–governance framework built and shown through cases in Limpopo and Mekong.•Framework captures social and hydrological complexity, dynamics and scale.•Possibility for water governance to ‘bounce forward’ (transform) to improved state. Resilience is a multidimensional concept that is increasingly used to understand environmental change in hydrological systems. Yet, the current discussion about water governance and resilience remains relatively limited, with resilience typically seen as a normative outcome for governance (i.e., to be resilient against change). Using a theoretical multiplicity approach, we explore how the theories of social-ecological systems (SES), resilience and interactive (water) governance can provide new insights for water governance studies. We propose a resilience–governance framework that captures the partly overlapping but distinct characteristics from these three theories. The framework aims to develop a more nuanced way of using resilience-thinking for water governance, viewing resilience as a function of three capacities (absorptive, adaptive and transformative capacity) and noting the simultaneous existence of three interpretations for resilience (as a property, process and outcome) across different scales. The framework also considers issues of power and equity, which are often missing from resilience framings. We illustrate the framework with two case studies – the Tonle Sap Lake in Cambodia and a small sub-catchment of the Limpopo River Basin in South Africa – to provide two distinct examples of the possibilities of resilient governance. Finally, we consider what the framework suggests more broadly for ongoing discussions around resilience and water governance, including the possibilities for governance to also ‘bounce forward’ – i.e., transform – to a new, improved state. We argue that resilience-thinking may be valuable in understanding governance characteristics and guiding governance processes, in addition to seeing resilience (just) as a normative end-goal. In this way, the article supports an epistemological shift away from focusing on institutional structure, towards capturing the dynamic processes within governing systems.