Loading…
A clear case for dust obscuration of the lunar retroreflectors
The passive retroreflector arrays placed on the moon by Apollo 11, 14 and 15 astronauts continue to produce valuable Earth–Moon range measurements that enable high-precision tests of gravitational physics, as well as studies of geo- and selenophysics. The optical throughput of these retroreflectors...
Saved in:
Published in: | Icarus (New York, N.Y. 1962) N.Y. 1962), 2024-07, Vol.417, p.116113, Article 116113 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The passive retroreflector arrays placed on the moon by Apollo 11, 14 and 15 astronauts continue to produce valuable Earth–Moon range measurements that enable high-precision tests of gravitational physics, as well as studies of geo- and selenophysics. The optical throughput of these retroreflectors has declined since their deployment, with an additional signal loss at full moon when the reflectors experience direct solar illumination. We show that the loss in return rate can be attributed to the accumulation of a thin layer of lunar dust on the surfaces of the corner cube retroreflectors. First, a careful analysis of the optical link budget for the Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-ranging Operation (APOLLO) experiment reveals that the lunar return rate is 15–20 times smaller than predicted, a deficit that can be explained by a reflector dust covering fraction of ∼50%. Second, range measurements taken during a lunar eclipse indicate that the solar illumination of the retroreflectors degrades their throughput by an additional factor of ∼15. Finally, a numerical simulation of heat transfer in dust-coated reflectors is able to model the resulting thermal lensing effect, in which thermal gradients in the retroreflectors degrade their far-field diffraction pattern. A comparison of this simulation to eclipse measurements finds a dust coverage fraction of ∼50%. Taken together, the link analysis, eclipse observations and thermal modeling support the claim that the retroreflectors are obscured by lunar dust, with both link budget and simulation independently finding the dust fraction to be ∼50%.
•APOLLO regularly observes a decreased return rate during full moon.•This improves by a factor of 15 during a lunar eclipse, confirmed by observations.•APOLLO’s link budget shows the observed rate is 15–20 times smaller than predicted.•We find that a dust obscuration factor of 50% best explains the observed deficit. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0019-1035 1090-2643 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.icarus.2024.116113 |