Loading…

Forecasting with imprecise probabilities

We review de Finetti’s two coherence criteria for determinate probabilities: coherence1 defined in terms of previsions for a set of events that are undominated by the status quo – previsions immune to a sure-loss – and coherence2 defined in terms of forecasts for events undominated in Brier score by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of approximate reasoning 2012-11, Vol.53 (8), p.1248-1261
Main Authors: Seidenfeld, Teddy, Schervish, Mark J., Kadane, Joseph B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We review de Finetti’s two coherence criteria for determinate probabilities: coherence1 defined in terms of previsions for a set of events that are undominated by the status quo – previsions immune to a sure-loss – and coherence2 defined in terms of forecasts for events undominated in Brier score by a rival forecast. We propose a criterion of IP-coherence2 based on a generalization of Brier score for IP-forecasts that uses 1-sided, lower and upper, probability forecasts. However, whereas Brier score is a strictly proper scoring rule for eliciting determinate probabilities, we show that there is no real-valued strictly proper IP-score. Nonetheless, with respect to either of two decision rules – Γ-maximin or (Levi’s) E-admissibility-+-Γ-maximin – we give a lexicographic strictly proper IP-scoring rule that is based on Brier score.
ISSN:0888-613X
1873-4731
DOI:10.1016/j.ijar.2012.06.018