Group-specific PCR-RFLP and real-time PCR methods for detection and tentative discrimination of strictly anaerobic beer-spoilage bacteria of the class Clostridia

• Published in: International journal of food microbiology 2008-07, Vol.125 (2), p.162-169
• Main Authors: Juvonen, Riikka, Koivula, Teija, Haikara, Auli
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: anaerobes; anaerobic conditions; bacterial contamination; Beer; Beer - microbiology; beers; Biological and medical sciences; brewing industry; Clostridium; Clostridium - classification; Clostridium - isolation & purification; Colony Count, Microbial; cross reaction; DNA, Bacterial - chemistry; DNA, Bacterial - genetics; food contamination; Food Contamination - analysis; Food industries; Food Microbiology; food pathogens; food sanitation; food spoilage; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; General aspects; Group-specific 16S rDNA based primer pair; Megasphaera; Methods of analysis, processing and quality control, regulation, standards; PCR-RFLP; Pectinatus; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods; Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length; Quality Control; Real-time PCR; restriction fragment length polymorphism; Selenomonas; Sensitivity and Specificity; Species Specificity; Strictly anaerobic beer-spoilage bacteria
• ISSN: 0168-1605; 1879-3460
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.03.042

The strictly anaerobic brewery contaminants of the genera Pectinatus, Megasphaera, Selenomonas and Zymophilus in the class Clostridia constitute an important group of spoilage bacteria of unpasteurised, packaged beers. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate group-specific PCR methods to detect and differentiate these bacteria in beer. A group-specific primer pair targeting a 342-bp variable region of the 16S rRNA gene was designed and evaluated in end-point PCR with gel electrophoresis and in real-time PCR with SYBR Green I dye. Significant cross-reactions with DNAs from any of the forty-two brewery-related, non-target microbes or from real brewery samples were not detected in either PCR system. The group-specific end-point and real-time PCR products could be differentiated according to species/genus and spoilage potential using restriction fragment length polymorphism ( KpnI, XmnI, BssHII, ScaI) and melting point curve analysis, respectively. In combination with a rapid DNA extraction method, the PCR reactions detected ca 10 0–10 3 CFU per 25 ml of beer depending on the strain and on the PCR system. The end-point and real-time PCR analysis took 6–7 h and 2–3 h, respectively. Pre-PCR enrichment of beer samples for 1–3 days ensured the detection of even a single cultivable cell. The PCR and cultivation results of real brewery samples were mostly congruent but the PCR methods were occasionally more sensitive. The PCR methods developed allow the detection of all the nine beer-spoilage Pectinatus, Megasphaera, Selenomonas and Zymophilus species in a single reaction and their differentiation below group level and reduce the analysis time for testing of their presence in beer samples by 1–2 days. The methods can be applied for brewery routine quality control and for studying occurrence, diversity and numbers of the strictly anaerobic beer spoilers in the brewing process.