Self-optimizing control structure design in oxy-fuel circulating fluidized bed combustion

• Published in: International journal of greenhouse gas control 2015-12, Vol.43, p.93-107
• Main Authors: Niva, Laura, Ikonen, Enso, Kovács, Jenö
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Circulating fluidized bed; Control structure design; Oxy-fuel combustion; Power plants; Self-optimizing control
• ISSN: 1750-5836; 1878-0148
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.10.012

•Self-optimizing control was applied in a circulating fluidized bed boiler.•Steady-state approximations of a validated dynamic CFB model were used.•Method validity was supported by air-CFB results.•Several structures showed satisfactory steady-state performance in oxy-CFB control.•Oxy-CFB control structure candidates are suggested for further analysis. A wealth of control designs and experience are available for traditional air combustion in circulating fluidized bed (CFB) boilers. For the novel process of oxy combustion (for facilitated CO2 capture) input gas compositions and flows can be adjusted independently, which decouples fluidization and oxygen carrying tasks and introduces new degrees of freedom and alternatives for control. The self-optimizing control approach (as formulated by Skogestad and colleagues in the 2000s) was used with steady-state approximations of a validated dynamic model for a pilot-size CFB combustor to study how the added degrees of freedom should be used. Instead of centralized online optimization of setpoints, self-optimizing control searches for a set of controlled variables which can be kept at constant setpoints despite disturbances and measurement errors, resulting in performance with acceptable steady-state loss. Results for air firing support method validity by suggesting the common practice in control; keeping power, flue gas O2 and primary air/fuel feed ratio constant. For oxy firing, various control structures could satisfactorily compensate for studied disturbances and errors. Results suggest direct oxidant O2% control or simpler feed-forward solutions in line with current industrial CFB control, or alternatively using the added degrees of freedom for controlling variables such as furnace temperatures. Differences in, e.g. controllability, dynamic performance and implementation cost are relevant in further studies. The results serve as a first step in oxy-CFB control studies, suggesting candidate structures for dynamic analysis.