A user study of auditory versus visual interfaces for use while driving

• Published in: International journal of human-computer studies 2008-05, Vol.66 (5), p.318-332
• Main Authors: Sodnik, Jaka, Dicke, Christina, Tomažič, Sašo, Billinghurst, Mark
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Applied sciences; Auditory interface; Computer science; control theory; systems; Computer systems and distributed systems. User interface; Distraction; Driving simulator; Exact sciences and technology; Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction; Interaction; Mobile device; Road transportation and traffic; Software; Spatial sound; Visual interface
• ISSN: 1071-5819; 1095-9300
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.11.001

This paper describes a user study on interaction with a mobile device installed in a driving simulator. Two new auditory interfaces were proposed and their effectiveness and efficiency were compared to a standard visual interface. Both auditory interfaces consisted of spatialized auditory cues representing individual items in the hierarchical structure of the menu. In the first auditory interface all items of the current level of the menu were played simultaneously. In the second auditory interface only one item was played at a time. The visual interface was shown on a small in-vehicle LCD screen on the dashboard. In all three cases, a custom-made interaction device (a scrolling wheel and two buttons) attached to the steering wheel was used for controlling the interface. The driving performance, task completion times, perceived workload and overall user satisfaction were evaluated. The experiment proved that both auditory interfaces were effective to use in a mobile environment, but were not faster than the visual interface. In the case of shorter tasks, e.g. changing the active profile or deleting an image, the task completion times were comparable for all interfaces; however, both the driving performance was significantly better and the perceived workload was lower when using the auditory interfaces. The test subjects also reported a high overall satisfaction with the auditory interfaces. The latter were labelled as easier to use, more satisfying and more adequate for performing the required tasks than the visual interface. The results of the survey are not surprising as there is a stronger competition for the visual attention between the visual interface and the primary task (driving the car) than in the case of using the auditory interface. So although both types of interfaces were proven to be effective, the visual interface was less efficient as it strongly distracted the user from performing the primary task.