Bubble growth models in saturated pool boiling of water on a smooth metallic surface: Assessment and a new recommendation

• Published in: International journal of heat and mass transfer 2023-07, Vol.208, p.124065, Article 124065
• Main Authors: Mahmoud, M.M., Karayiannis, T.G.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bubble growth mechanisms; Bubble growth models; Metallic surfaces; Pool boiling
• ISSN: 0017-9310; 1879-2189
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.124065

•Pool boiling at atmospheric and sub-atmospheric pressure using water.•Comparative assessment of contributing mechanisms to bubble growth.•Comparison of models of bubble growth with new experimental results.•Recommendation for predicting bubble departure time and bubble radius.•Recommendation for bubble growth rates. Prediction of bubble growth rate is very important for the development of accurate models for bubble departure diameter and thus the heat transfer rates in nucleate boiling. This paper presents an evaluation study to the existing homogeneous and heterogeneous bubble growth models using our experimental data for bubble growth in saturated pool boiling of deionized water on a plain copper surface. The experiments were conducted at pressures 1, 0.5 and 0.15 bar and superheat in the range 5.1 – 19.5 K. To start with, the paper presents a critical review on bubble growth models in homogeneous and heterogeneous boiling. It was found that homogeneous growth models achieved some partial agreement with the experimental data at some conditions and thus they should be used carefully in heterogeneous boiling. There was a good agreement between some of the models that were suggested based on the assumption that bubble growth occurs due to evaporation from the superheated boundary layer around the bubble. The models based on microlayer evaporation only could not explain the experimental data, i.e. partial agreement at some conditions. The model that predicted the data very well at all conditions was the “relaxation boundary layer” model by Van Stralen [25]. This model was generalized in the current study by suggesting two new empirical models for the departure diameter and departure time.