Techno-economic evaluation of renewable hydrogen generation strategies for the industrial sector

• Published in: International journal of hydrogen energy 2024-03, Vol.60, p.1020-1040
• Main Authors: Ramsebner, Jasmine, Linares, Pedro, Hiesl, Albert, Haas, Reinhard
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Climate change; Decarbonisation; Hydrogen; Industry; Renewable energy systems; Storage; Variability
• ISSN: 0360-3199
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.02.167

Renewable hydrogen is considered as one of the key technologies that may be needed to fully decarbonise our economies, providing the high-temperature heat, fuels and feedstock that might not be possible to electrify. Several pilot projects are underway, and some assessments of the economics of green hydrogen have been published. However, most of them have assessed the costs of producing renewable hydrogen in large-scale, grid-connected units. Another option, pointed by many as a robust strategy in the early stages, is to produce hydrogen locally, in “hydrogen valleys”, to serve industrial demand. In this paper, the economics of the different technical configurations and strategies that might be used for this decentralised, variable-demand option are analysed, accounting for the impact that a non-constant operation may cause on the operational efficiency of electrolysers, and for the potential benefits of local hydrogen storage. Our results show that when hydrogen demand is variable, production costs are higher compared to the constant demand case, due to the higher electrolyser size required. Electricity price optimization plus hydrogen storage can be a valuable option in some cases, although the cost benefit is negligible (about 1%) unless price volatility in the market increases with higher RES shares, or investment costs decrease significantly. Sourcing electricity exclusively from a dedicated renewable power plant can only become competitive if electricity market prices rise as observed recently or triggered by increasing CO2 prices. •Different production strategies are compared to minimise H2 production costs.•Faraday efficiency increases costs for variable electricity generation.•Electricity price optimization is best for H2 valleys, although compression costs may change this.•Direct H2 production from renewable plants is not competitive with current prices.